← All Comparisons

Mistral Medium 3 vs GLM-4.7

A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and GLM-4.7 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3GLM-4.7Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.40$0.60+50%
Output / 1M tokens$2.00$2.20+10%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K128K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3GLM-4.7
MMLU-Pro76%84.3%
HumanEval87%
GPQA85.7%

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Medium 3GLM-4.7
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Mistral Medium 3 Strengths

  • Very affordable for mid-tier quality
  • Good multilingual performance

Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses

  • Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
  • Smaller community and tooling

GLM-4.7 Strengths

  • Excellent value — strong benchmarks at $0.60/$2.20
  • Open-weight (MIT license)
  • Top scores on AIME 25 and BrowseComp

GLM-4.7 Weaknesses

  • No tool-use support yet
  • 358B parameters — still heavy for self-hosting
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GLM-4.7 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.0% avg).

Larger context: GLM-4.7 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if cost matters most. Choose GLM-4.7 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons