← All Comparisons
Mistral Medium 3 vs GLM-5
A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3 | GLM-5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $1.00 | +150% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $3.20 | +60% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 128K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 70.4% |
| HumanEval | 87% | 91% |
| GPQA | — | 72% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
GLM-5 Strengths
- ✓Open-weight (MIT license) — self-hostable
- ✓77.8% SWE-Bench Verified — top-tier coding
- ✓128K max output — huge generation window
GLM-5 Weaknesses
- ✗MMLU-Pro lags behind Western flagships
- ✗744B parameters — heavy to self-host
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.5% avg).
Larger context: GLM-5 supports 200K tokens.
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if cost matters most. Choose GLM-5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.