← All Comparisons
Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-4o
A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and GPT-4o (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $2.50 | +525% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $10.00 | +400% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 80.5% |
| HumanEval | 87% | 91% |
| GPQA | — | 64.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| audio | ✗ | ✓ |
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
GPT-4o Strengths
- ✓Well-established and reliable
- ✓Large ecosystem of tools and integrations
GPT-4o Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by GPT-5 series
- ✗Higher price than newer, better alternatives
Quick Verdict
Best value: Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.5% avg).
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.