← All Comparisons
Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-4o Mini
A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.15 | -63% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $0.60 | -70% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 87% | 87.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.5% avg).
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.