← All Comparisons
Mistral Medium 3 vs o3
A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and o3 (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3 | o3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.40 | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.00 | $1.60 | -20% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 100K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 87% |
| HumanEval | 87% | 94.5% |
| GPQA | — | 79.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Mistral Medium 3 Strengths
- ✓Very affordable for mid-tier quality
- ✓Good multilingual performance
Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
- ✗Smaller community and tooling
o3 Strengths
- ✓Recently repriced — now very cheap
- ✓Excellent logical reasoning
- ✓200K context window
o3 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower due to reasoning overhead
- ✗Overkill for simple tasks
Quick Verdict
Best value: o3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: o3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).
Larger context: o3 supports 200K tokens.
Choose o3 if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.