← All Comparisons
o3 vs Llama 4 Maverick
A detailed comparison of o3 (OpenAI) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | o3 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.31 | -23% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.60 | $0.85 | -47% |
| Context window | 200K | 1M | — |
| Max output | 100K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | o3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 87% | 80.5% |
| HumanEval | 94.5% | 90.2% |
| GPQA | 79.2% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | o3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
o3 Strengths
- ✓Recently repriced — now very cheap
- ✓Excellent logical reasoning
- ✓200K context window
o3 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower due to reasoning overhead
- ✗Overkill for simple tasks
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: o3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose o3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.