DeepSeek vs Meta
A comprehensive comparison of DeepSeek (2 models) and Meta (2 models) across pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capabilities. Updated for 2026.
Provider Overview
DeepSeek
Models
2
Price range
$0.42 – $2.74
Avg benchmarks
83.0%
Avg context
146K
Meta
Models
2
Price range
$0.81 – $1.16
Avg benchmarks
82.7%
Avg context
5.5M
Model Lineup Comparison
| Model | Provider | Category | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Avg Bench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek | Reasoning | $0.55 | $2.19 | 128K | 82.5% |
| DeepSeek V3 | DeepSeek | Open Source | $0.14 | $0.28 | 164K | 83.5% |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | Open Source | $0.18 | $0.63 | 10M | 80.1% |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | Open Source | $0.31 | $0.85 | 1M | 85.3% |
Head-to-Head by Category
Reasoning
$0.55/1M
$2.19/1M
128K
82.5%
Open Source
$0.14/1M
$0.28/1M
164K
83.5%
$0.31/1M
$0.85/1M
1M
85.3%
Verdict
Best on price: DeepSeek offers the cheapest option at $0.42/1M tokens combined, vs $0.81/1M from Meta.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek averages 83.0% across models, vs 82.7% from Meta.
Larger context: Meta averages 5.5M context window across models.
More models: Meta offers 2 models vs 2 from DeepSeek.
Choose DeepSeek if cost is your priority. Choose DeepSeek if you need the highest quality across your workloads.