← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Pro (Google) and GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 ProGLM-5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$1.00-50%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$3.20-73%
Context window1M200K
Max output65.536K128K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGLM-5
MMLU-Pro89.8%70.4%
HumanEval94%91%
GPQA77%72%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 ProGLM-5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Pro Strengths

  • Stable and well-tested
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong multimodal with audio

Gemini 3 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 3.1 Pro
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

GLM-5 Strengths

  • Open-weight (MIT license) — self-hostable
  • 77.8% SWE-Bench Verified — top-tier coding
  • 128K max output — huge generation window

GLM-5 Weaknesses

  • MMLU-Pro lags behind Western flagships
  • 744B parameters — heavy to self-host
  • China-based — availability concerns

Quick Verdict

Best value: GLM-5 is the more affordable option at $1/$3.2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose GLM-5 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons