← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.15 | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.60 | — |
| Context window | 128K | 1M | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 76% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 89.5% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths
- ✓One of the cheapest models available
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Free tier available
Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
- ✗Output quality inconsistent on edge cases
Quick Verdict
Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (82.8% avg).
Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o Mini if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.