← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.18 | +20% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.63 | +5% |
| Context window | 128K | 10M | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 74.2% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 86% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Scout scores higher on average across available benchmarks (80.1% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Scout if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.