← All Comparisons

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Claude Haiku 4.5

A detailed comparison of GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Haiku 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.80-60%
Output / 1M tokens$16.00$4.00-75%
Context window200K200K
Max output65.536K8.192K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Haiku 4.5
MMLU-Pro90%69.4%
HumanEval96.5%88.1%
GPQA78%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Haiku 4.5
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons