← All Comparisons

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$5.00+150%
Output / 1M tokens$16.00$25.00+56%
Context window200K200K
Max output65.536K32K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Opus 4.6
MMLU-Pro90%89.5%
HumanEval96.5%95%
GPQA78%75.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-5.3 CodexClaude Opus 4.6
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-5.3 Codex is the more affordable option at $2/$16 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons