← All Comparisons

Mistral Large 3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

A detailed comparison of Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Large 3Claude Haiku 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.80-60%
Output / 1M tokens$5.00$4.00-20%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K8.192K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMistral Large 3Claude Haiku 4.5
MMLU-Pro83%69.4%
HumanEval91%88.1%

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3Claude Haiku 4.5
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Mistral Large 3 Strengths

  • Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
  • Strong multilingual support
  • European data sovereignty option

Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses

  • Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
  • Smaller ecosystem

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).

Larger context: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Large 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons