← All Comparisons

Mistral Large 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

A detailed comparison of Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Large 3Claude Sonnet 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$3.00+50%
Output / 1M tokens$5.00$15.00+200%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K16K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMistral Large 3Claude Sonnet 4.5
MMLU-Pro83%84.5%
HumanEval91%93%
GPQA68.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3Claude Sonnet 4.5
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Mistral Large 3 Strengths

  • Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
  • Strong multilingual support
  • European data sovereignty option

Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses

  • Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
  • Smaller ecosystem

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths

  • Well-tested and stable
  • Strong coding and analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
  • Same price as the newer model

Quick Verdict

Best value: Mistral Large 3 is the more affordable option at $2/$5 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).

Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Mistral Large 3 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons