← All Comparisons

Mistral Large 3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Large 3GPT-5.3 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$2.00
Output / 1M tokens$5.00$16.00+220%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMistral Large 3GPT-5.3 Codex
MMLU-Pro83%90%
HumanEval91%96.5%
GPQA78%

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Large 3GPT-5.3 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Mistral Large 3 Strengths

  • Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
  • Strong multilingual support
  • European data sovereignty option

Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses

  • Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
  • Smaller ecosystem

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Quick Verdict

Best value: Mistral Large 3 is the more affordable option at $2/$5 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Larger context: GPT-5.3 Codex supports 200K tokens.

Choose Mistral Large 3 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons