← All Comparisons

Grok 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

A detailed comparison of Grok 4 (xAI) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGrok 4Claude Haiku 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$0.80-73%
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$4.00-73%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K8.192K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGrok 4Claude Haiku 4.5
MMLU-Pro86%69.4%
HumanEval93%88.1%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok 4Claude Haiku 4.5
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons