← All Comparisons

Grok 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of Grok 4 (xAI) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGrok 4Claude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$5.00+67%
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$25.00+67%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K32K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGrok 4Claude Opus 4.6
MMLU-Pro86%89.5%
HumanEval93%95%
GPQA72%75.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok 4Claude Opus 4.6
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Quick Verdict

Best value: Grok 4 is the more affordable option at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Opus 4.6 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Grok 4 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons