← All Comparisons
Grok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
A detailed comparison of Grok 4 (xAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Grok 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $3.00 | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $15.00 | — |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86% | 86% |
| HumanEval | 93% | 94% |
| GPQA | 72% | 70% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Grok 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| web-search | ✓ | ✗ |
Grok 4 Strengths
- ✓Built-in web search and real-time data
- ✓Strong reasoning
- ✓$25 free credits for new users
Grok 4 Weaknesses
- ✗Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
- ✗Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Opus 4.5 quality at 1/5th the cost
- ✓Best value for production workloads
- ✓1M context in beta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Long context pricing doubles above 200K
- ✗Slightly below Opus 4.6 on hardest tasks
Quick Verdict
Best value: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the more affordable option at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).
Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.