← All Comparisons

Grok 4 vs GPT-5.2 Codex

A detailed comparison of Grok 4 (xAI) and GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGrok 4GPT-5.2 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$1.75-42%
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$14.00-7%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGrok 4GPT-5.2 Codex
MMLU-Pro86%89%
HumanEval93%95.5%
GPQA72%76%

Capabilities

CapabilityGrok 4GPT-5.2 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths

  • Strong coding performance
  • Available via API now
  • 200K context window

GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 5.3
  • Higher output cost than some competitors

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-5.2 Codex is the more affordable option at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.8% avg).

Larger context: GPT-5.2 Codex supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons